Assignment 1 Enhancing Chronic Disease Management and Preventive Healthcare Policies

Assignment 1
Enhancing Chronic Disease Management and Preventive Healthcare Policies
Chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, and obesity
continue to pose significant public health challenges. Despite advances in treatment and
prevention, healthcare systems must strengthen their policies to ensure effective disease
management and improve patient outcomes. Effective chronic disease management (CDM)
includes early diagnosis, patient education, lifestyle modifications, medication adherence,
and regular monitoring. Additionally, preventive healthcare policies promote wellness and
reduce long-term healthcare costs by focusing on disease prevention strategies such as
vaccinations, screenings, and health education (Caron et al., 2023). This discussion
evaluates existing policies related to chronic disease management and prevention,
identifying areas for improvement and alignment with federal and state regulations.
Policy Analysis
This evaluation focuses on a not-for-profit regional hospital in New York, widely recognized
for its dedication to high-quality, patient-centered care. The hospital serves a diverse
population across Bronx County, Westchester County, Rockland County, and parts of
Orange County, offering both acute and outpatient services. The surrounding communities
exhibit notable socioeconomic disparities, with approximately 11% of residents living below
the poverty line and over 22% relying on Medicaid for healthcare coverage (Reynolds et al.,
2019). These challenges highlight the critical need for comprehensive chronic disease
management programs and preventive healthcare initiatives to improve health outcomes,
particularly for underserved populations.
The hospital has implemented a Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM)
Policy to address the rising burden of non-communicable diseases. This policy emphasizes
early screening, patient-centered education, lifestyle interventions, and digital health tools to
track patient progress. Key components include routine diabetes and hypertension
screenings, smoking cessation programs, nutritional counseling, and telehealth services for
remote monitoring. However, gaps remain in patient adherence to treatment plans and the
integration of behavioral health services for patients with chronic conditions (Heath et al.,
2024).
Comparison to Healthcare Law or Guidelines
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Chronic Disease Prevention Programs, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
(USPSTF) guidelines provide the foundation for evaluating the hospital’s CDPM policy. The
ACA has significantly expanded access to preventive services, mandating insurance
coverage for screenings, vaccinations, and counseling for chronic disease prevention. The
CDC’s National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) and Million Hearts initiative focus on
reducing diabetes and cardiovascular disease risks through community-based programs.
Additionally, USPSTF guidelines outline evidence-based preventive services such as routine
blood pressure checks, cholesterol screenings, and tobacco cessation programs (Smith et
al., 2023).
The hospital’s CDPM policy aligns with federal and state regulations by promoting access to
screenings, digital health tools, and community-based wellness programs. However,
adherence to USPSTF guidelines on preventive screenings is inconsistent, particularly in
underserved populations with limited healthcare access (Reynolds et al., 2019). Improving
community outreach programs and incorporating mobile health clinics could enhance
accessibility and align the hospital’s policy with national healthcare standards.
Legal and Ethical Implications
Non-compliance with chronic disease management and prevention policies carries legal,
ethical, and financial implications. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandates preventive care
coverage, and failure to offer these services could result in penalties or loss of federal
funding (Caron et al., 2023). Ethically, healthcare providers have a responsibility to promote
patient well-being, and neglecting chronic disease prevention contradicts this principle.
Financially, untreated chronic conditions contribute to increased hospital readmissions,
higher treatment costs, and reduced patient quality of life.
Neglecting chronic disease management policies can also negatively impact healthcare
equity. Lower-income communities often face barriers to healthcare access, leading to
higher rates of preventable diseases. Addressing these disparities requires targeted
community health programs and increased investment in preventive healthcare education
and screenings (Heath et al., 2024).
Benchmark Analysis
To assess the effectiveness of the CDPM policy, the hospital must compare its performance
to industry benchmarks in chronic disease management, patient engagement, and
preventive care uptake. Key benchmarks include diabetes control rates, hypertension control
rates, and preventive screening compliance. The National Committee for Quality Assurance
(NCQA) recommends an HbA1c level of below 7% for well-managed diabetes, making it an
essential benchmark for evaluating hospital data against national standards (Smith et al.,
2023). Similarly, the American Heart Association (AHA) recommends maintaining blood
pressure below 130/80 mmHg, highlighting the importance of tracking hypertension
management outcomes to ensure adherence to best practices. In addition, the U.S.
Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) establishes screening recommendations for
cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular risks, making it crucial for the hospital to compare its
screening rates to national averages to assess performance (Reynolds et al., 2019).
While the hospital’s policy supports preventive healthcare and chronic disease management,
adherence rates to recommended screenings and follow-up care remain below benchmarks.
Additionally, gaps exist in patient participation in wellness programs and digital health
monitoring tools (Caron et al., 2023). Implementing incentive-based participation models and
expanding community outreach efforts can help bridge these gaps, ultimately improving
chronic disease outcomes and patient engagement.
Quality Improvement Implications
Adherence to chronic disease management and prevention policies is crucial for improving
patient outcomes and reducing long-term healthcare costs. Prioritizing preventive healthcare
strategies ensures that patients receive early interventions, reducing complications and
hospitalizations. To enhance policy effectiveness, the hospital can implement targeted
community health programs, telehealth and digital monitoring, behavioral health integration,
and financial incentives for preventive care (Heath et al., 2024).
Expanding mobile health clinics and community partnerships can increase access to
screenings and wellness education, ensuring that underserved populations receive essential
preventive care services (Smith et al., 2023). Enhancing digital health tools, such as remote
patient monitoring (RPM) for hypertension and diabetes, can improve patient adherence and
allow healthcare providers to track health trends more effectively (Reynolds et al., 2019).
Addressing mental health concerns related to chronic disease management, such as stress
and depression, through integrated behavioral health services can further improve patient
engagement and overall well-being (Caron et al., 2023). Additionally, offering insurance
premium reductions or wellness rewards can encourage regular health check-ups and
lifestyle changes, promoting long-term adherence to preventive healthcare practices.
Failure to meet preventive care benchmarks can have severe legal and financial
consequences. Hospitals that fail to implement evidence-based chronic disease
management strategies may face regulatory penalties, increased readmission rates, and
loss of patient trust. Additionally, a lack of focus on preventive healthcare can lead to rising
healthcare costs and resource strain (Heath et al., 2024).
Conclusion
The hospital’s Chronic Disease Prevention and Management (CDPM) Policy aligns with
national standards, including ACA, CDC, and USPSTF guidelines. However, gaps in patient
adherence, preventive screening compliance, and behavioral health integration indicate a
need for enhanced outreach programs, digital health tools, and financial incentives. By
addressing these areas, the hospital can improve chronic disease outcomes, reduce
healthcare disparities, and promote a proactive approach to patient well-being.
References
Caron, R., Noel, K., Reed, R. N., Sibel, J., & Smith, H. J. (2023). Health promotion, health
protection, and disease prevention: Challenges and opportunities in a dynamic landscape.
AJPM Focus, 3(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focus.2023.100167
Heath, L., Stevens, R., Nicholson, B. D., Wherton, J., Gao, M., Callan, C., Haasova, S., &
Aveyard, P. (2024). Strategies to improve the implementation of preventive care in primary
care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03588-5
Reynolds, R., Dennis, S., Hasan, I., Slewa, J., Chen, W., Tian, D., Bobba, S., & Zwar, N.
(2019). A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care.
BMC Family Practice, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3
Smith, J. D., Naoom, S. F., Saldana, L., Sharada Shantharam, Tina Anderson Smith, & Kohr,
J. M. (2023). Preventing and Managing Chronic Disease Through Implementation Science:
Editor’s Introduction to the Supplemental Issue. Prevention Science.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-023-01617-y
*********************************************************************************************************
Assignment 2
NHS FPX6004 Healthcare Law and Policy
There is a dire need to have a policy and practice guidelines in place to address benchmark
metric underperformance in a healthcare organization (a New York-based hospital in this
study). Benchmarks from local, state or federal policies like CMS and CDC are to ensure
safe and high quality care and minimize risk to patients. If you don’t meet those benchmarks
you put patient safety at risk, risk legal penalties and may get financially penalized with
reduced reimbursement.
Current Benchmark and Underperformance Score
In this organization (the hospital), hand hygiene is the benchmark metric under review. WHO
and Leapfrog’s Hand Hygiene Standard recommends 90% or higher as the benchmark for
effective infection prevention. Internal audits show that the hospital’s hand hygiene
compliance is at 75% which is 15% below the standard (Mathur, 2021). This big gap requires
immediate intervention through revised policies, staff training and better monitoring system.
Addressing this gap will not only align the organization with regulatory requirements but also
patient outcomes and HAI rates.
Why Create the Policy
Creating policy and practice guidelines to address benchmark underperformance is
necessary for compliance with healthcare laws and patient outcomes. Benchmark metrics
are often mandated by local, state or federal healthcare policies to measure quality and
safety of care (Mathur, 2021)
. When a healthcare organization fails to meet those benchmarks like timely reporting of
infections or consistent hand hygiene compliance it not only risks legal penalties and loss of
accreditation but also patient safety. Having clear policies ensures staff accountability,
streamline process and culture of continuous improvement.
Having effective policy and practice guidelines is necessary to address shortfalls in meeting
healthcare benchmark metrics like hand hygiene compliance or timely infection reporting.
Benchmark metrics are established by local, state and federal healthcare policies to ensure
patient safety, improve clinical outcomes and compliance with standards like CDC, CMS and
The Joint Commission. When metrics are not met it reflects gaps in quality and performance
that may lead to increased risk of healthcare associated infections (HAIs) to patients and
staff. Policies for these underperformances can guide staff behavior, promote accountability
and standardize practice to improve overall performance (Chakma et al., 2024)
. For example having real time monitoring system for hand hygiene or streamlining infection
reporting protocol can address the identified issues and align with regulatory requirements
and best practices.
Repercussions If Nothing is Done
Not addressing these gaps can have serious consequences. From patient safety
perspective, infection control lapses can result to increased HAI, longer hospital stay, higher
morbidity and mortality. Legal consequences are financial penalties, loss of accreditation or
disqualification from Medicare and Medicaid programs. Noncompliance can also damage the
organization’s reputation and erode public trust and patient satisfaction.
There is evidence from multiple sources. Studies show robust infection prevention strategies
like hand hygiene audits and electronic tracking of compliance reduce HAIs.
Organizational Policy and Practice Guidelines
To improve hand hygiene compliance and timely infection reporting this policy proposes an
Infection Prevention and Benchmark Compliance Program. The program will enforce hand
hygiene protocols through staff training, visual reminders and regular audits. An electronic
hand hygiene monitoring system will track compliance and provide real time feedback.
Timely infection reporting will be enhanced by creating a central infection data repository
with automated reporting reminders. A multidisciplinary team will oversee compliance,
identify gaps and provide staff support to ensure consistency. This will create a culture of
accountability, reduce hospital acquired infections and improve patient safety.
Compliance with Healthcare Policy
This proposal is in alignment with the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005
(PSQIA) which promotes transparency and accountability in healthcare and the CDC Core
Infection Prevention Practices which emphasizes proper hygiene and infection control
(Smith, 2020). It also meets the Conditions of Participation (CoPs) established by CMS so
the hospital can continue to be funded and accredited. By focusing on these metrics the
hospital can meet federal and state regulations, improve patient care and protect its
reputation as a high performing hospital.
Policy Proposal and Practice Guidelines
To address the benchmark underperformance in hand hygiene compliance and timely
infection reporting the hospital should have a policy that includes evidence based practice
guidelines. To improve hand hygiene the hospital can adopt electronic monitoring systems
that track compliance in real time and provide automated feedback. Visual reminders, staff
training and a culture of accountability can also help adherence. To improve timely infection
reporting the hospital can integrate advanced infection surveillance software to identify and
communicate potential outbreaks quicker (Chakma et al., 2024)
. This will meet CDC and Joint Commission standards and create a safer environment for
patients and staff. Additionally antimicrobial stewardship programs can reduce hospital
acquired infections by promoting appropriate antibiotic use and preventing drug resistance.
Environmental, Regulatory, and Resource Considerations
These practice guidelines are however limited by environmental factors such as staff
workload, hospital arrangement and inadequate sanitation infrastructure which can affect the
success of these practice guideline. Overcrowded facilities, for instance, might elevate the
risk of hygiene lapses, and lack of proper maintenance with equipment can delay reporting.
The key element of staying open and avoiding penalties, consequences or even
accreditation jeopardy as per CMS’s Conditions of Participation is to meet regulatory
requirements such as those set by the CDC for infection control. More cost barriers could
also come into play, like funding for electronic monitoring systems or having enough staff to
facilitate training and reporting as examples (Armstrong-Novak et al., 2023)
. Financial means to support such initiatives, right allocation of resources and conspiring
leaders and staff are imperative to overcoming these barriers in order improvise a
mechanism for assured quality.
To enhance the specific goal of hand hygiene compliance, the practice guidelines derived
from the evidence based practice approach involve the implementation of strategies
including the training of the staff, providing them with real time feedback and the use of
electronic monitoring devices. This ensures that the staff is well informed on the protocols
that are laid down while feedback ensures that these practices are adhered to. Such tools
can assist in the identification of the compliance level, assessment of the gaps, and planning
of the required interventions. These strategies are consistent with the CDC and WHO
recommendations, and are in conformity with the federal healthcare policies including the
PSQIA and CDC infection prevention standards.
Ethical Evidence-Based Guidelines
These should be done while ensuring that the ethical considerations on cultural inclusivity
are observed so as to ensure that none is discriminated against in the process. For instance,
the training materials should be translated into different languages and the staff should be
reminded to embrace people of different culture.
These changes will have a direct effect on the stakeholders especially the healthcare
workers in the process of developing a stronger framework. This will lead to increased
accountability of the nurses, doctors and other infection control staff and may also lead to
changes in their work practices for instance, they may have to learn how to use the
monitoring systems more frequently or attend more training sessions. But these measures
should have the potential to create a better working environment, minimize stress and
produce better results for the patients.
Importance of Stakeholder Engagement in Policy Development
It is therefore important to involve the following key stakeholders in the development of a
practical and effective IC&P policy; the health care providers, infection control professionals,
managers, patients and the members of the community. This is because the frontline
workers are in a position to ensure that the infection control measures including hand
hygiene and PPE use is adhered to. Such specialists in infection control have the knowledge
on the best practices, while the hospital administrators make sure that there are adequate
materials and encouragement for the exercise. Engaging patients and community
representatives helps ensure the policy is culturally sensitive and meets the diverse needs of
the population served.
Better Implementation and Compliance
Stakeholder involvement is good for policy design but also for implementation and ongoing
success. When staff are part of the process they are more likely to adopt the policy and
therefore higher compliance and better infection control outcomes. Administrators can
provide the resources, patient advocates can help with communication and education and
regular feedback from these groups allows for continuous improvement of the policy so it
stays relevant and responsive to challenges.
Roles in Implementing Infection Control Policies
To implement the Infection Control and Prevention (IC&P) policy effectively collaboration
among key stakeholders is important. Healthcare providers, infection control specialists,
administrators and patients. Healthcare providers (doctors, nurses, support staff) will be
responsible for following the updated infection prevention protocols. Regular training, real
time compliance tracking and feedback systems will keep them engaged and accountable.
Infection control specialists will lead the monitoring and auditing processes to ensure
infection control standards are met and identify areas for improvement (Smith, 2020).
Administrators will provide the resources and integrate infection prevention into broader
quality initiatives and create a culture of safety. Patients and community members will be
educated on infection prevention and asked to provide feedback on their hospital experience
so the hospital can refine its practices.
Stakeholder Collaboration is Key to Policy Success
Stakeholder collaboration is important for the IC&P policy to be successful. When everyone
staff, administrators and patients are part of the process the policy becomes everyone’s
responsibility and compliance and patient safety improves. Regular feedback and audits will
allow for continuous improvement so the policy can adapt to real world challenges. Patients
being engaged ensures infection control becomes a norm not just a set of rules.
Conclusion
Conclusively, implementing an effective Infection Control and Prevention (IC&P) policy
requires a collaborative approach with healthcare providers, administrators, infection control
specialists and patients. By aligning with federal and state regulations, improving training
and monitoring and creating a culture of accountability the hospital can reduce healthcare
associated infections and improve patient safety. Everyone being involved ensures the policy
is not only implemented but continuously refined so the hospital can be a safer and more
efficient place for patients and staff.
References
Armstrong-Novak, J., Yu Juan, H., Cooper, K., & Bailey, P. (2023). Healthcare Personnel
Hand Hygiene Compliance: Are We There Yet? Healthcare Personnel Hand Hygiene
Compliance: Are We There Yet?, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-023-00806-8
Chakma, S. K., Hossen, S., Mahmud Rakib, T., Hoque, S., Islam, R., Biswas, T., Islam, Z., &
Munirul Islam, M. (2024). Effectiveness of a hand hygiene training intervention in improving
knowledge and compliance rate among healthcare workers in a respiratory disease hospital.
Heliyon, 10(5), e27286–e27286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27286
Mathur, P. (2021). Hand hygiene: Back to the basics of infection control. The Indian Journal
of Medical Research, 134(5), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5916.90985
Smith, E. (2020, September 28). StackPath. Www.hpnonline.com.
https://www.hpnonline.com/infection-prevention/article/21154755/hands-up-for-hygiene
*********************************************************************************************************
Assignment 3
Annotated Training Agenda
Policy Name: Electronic Health Records Implementation (EHR)
Purpose: Equip pilot/staff with the skills and knowledge required to effectively use the EHR
system and ensure compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements.
Training Details
Length and Number of Class Sessions
Number of Sessions: 3 sessions.
Time: 10:00 AM- 12:00 PM
Total Training Duration: 12 hours over two weeks (2 hours daily, 6 days a week).
Location of Classes
Primary Location: Simulation lab for hands-on practice.
Supplementary Location: Classroom for lectures and discussions.
Resources Needed
Teaching Staff:
Two EHR trainers with expertise in system navigation and troubleshooting.
One IT support specialist for technical assistance.
Equipment:
Computers or tablets preloaded with the EHR software.
Projector and screen for instructional materials.
Step-by-step user manuals and quick reference guides.
Technology: Access to a simulated EHR environment for practical exercises.
Supplies: Writing materials, sign-in sheets, and progress tracking forms.
Training Agenda
Training Agenda Outline Annotation
Introduction (15 Minutes) Welcome and Overview:
Good morning! I thank you all for being here with us today. First and foremost, I would
acknowledge the importance of the issue of dealing with tremendous amount of data
conventionally. The tiring paperwork certainly comes with great chances of human error and
mismanagement of other imperative roles that you play. Implementation of electronic health
records is undoubtedly paramount in this regard. Your expertise and dedication can prove to
be helpful in order to reduce burden on medical staff, ensure data accuracy, minimize
healthcare workforce burnout, and ultimately provide better healthcare services. This training
is composed of three sessions. The first sessions focuses on system features, such as
patient data entry, navigation of electronic charts, managing lab orders, and generating
reports. This foundational knowledge ensures you can use the system efficiently, reducing
errors and saving time during patient care (Aguirre et al., 2020). The hands-on practice
session will immerse you in real-world scenarios using the EHR system, allowing you to
actively engage with its functionalities under guided supervision. Finally, meticulously
devised assessments will help you reinforce and evaluate the knowledge and skills gained
during the prior sessions. By incorporating quizzes, scenario-based exercises, and
competency checklists, nurses can actively apply what they have learned in realistic
scenarios, ensuring retention and practical understanding.
Understanding the EHR Policy(30 Minutes) Purpose, Scope and Objectives
The policy of implementing electronic health records (EHRs), is intended to make managing,
retrieving, and storing patient health data easier. EHRs increase productivity, lower errors,
and improve provider-to-provider communication by centralizing data, all of which improve
patient outcomes. Features that save time and enhance decision-making, such as real-time
updates, simple access to patient records, and connection with diagnostic instruments, are
what make them effective (Aguirre et al., 2020). Additionally, EHRs are made to adhere to
the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which guarantees that
patient data is safely safeguarded by strong data encryption, audit trails, and access controls
while enabling the legitimate exchange of information to promote continuity of care.
Key Provisions and Guidelines:
Security, interoperability, and efficient usage to improve healthcare delivery are highlighted in
key provisions for Electronic Health Records (EHRs). While the Health Information
Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act encourages “Meaningful Use” to
enhance the quality of care, the HIPAA protects patient privacy through encryption, access
controls, and safe data management. EHRs must ensure data integrity through audits and
version controls, and facilitate smooth data sharing utilizing standards such as Health Level
Seven (HL7). The right of patients to view and modify their records is guaranteed, and staff
training guarantees the efficient and secure use of technology.
Roles and Responsibilities (20 Minutes) Roles and Responsibilities of Healthcare Staff:
The implementation of an EHR system will require collaboration across medical staff
(Fennelly et al., 2020). Physicians will document patient encounters and provide feedback,
while nurses will manage data entry, coordinate care, and assist patients with portals.
Administrative staff will handle scheduling, billing, and compliance, and IT teams will ensure
system maintenance and security. Clinical information providers will optimize workflows, train
staff, and monitor performance, while project managers will oversee implementation and
address challenges. Leadership will provide strategic oversight, allocate resources, and
foster adaptability. Together, these roles will ensure the EHR system is effectively adopted to
enhance patient care.
Practical Application:
Since everyone knows his/her role, let’s conduct an exercise that can provide an example of
how the roles can be played effectively in real life. The collaboration and interconnectedness
among the entire staff structure ensures effective implementation and output (Valentina et
al., 2019).
Training Strategies (30 Minutes) Interactive Lectures:
We will start implementing the policy delivering the brief yet interactive lectures first.
Interactive lectures are an effective introductory training strategy for implementing an EHR
policy.
Case Studies and Real World Scenarios:
Our training will also focus on Case studies and real life examples. Case studies offer
real-world examples that assist staff in understanding how the policy applies in typical
settings, they are a useful training tool for implementing EHR policies (Musa et al., 2023).
Participants can investigate the difficulties and best practices associated with EHR use,
including data entry, patient privacy, or system problems, by examining particular examples.
Staff members can explore ideas and comprehend how the policy affects patient care and
workflow by using case studies, which promote critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
Peer Review and Simulations:
To reduce errors and ensure collaboration we will also take peer review and simulation into
consideration. Peer review and simulations are effective in implementing EHR policy by
providing hands-on experience and encouraging collaborative learning. Peer review allows
colleagues to assess each other’s performance, share feedback, and identify best practices,
ensuring consistent application of the policy and improving the overall quality of care.
Simulations help employees practice using the EHR system in realistic scenarios, building
confidence and reducing errors.
Q&A to Clear Doubts (10 Minutes) Clarifying Confusion:
We will first identify and clear any doubts. Medical staff members can ask concerns and get
any doubts they may have about the EHR policy answered during a Q&A session. It
guarantees that they comprehend the system’s operation and how it impacts their workflow.
Taking Care of Particular Issues:
Due to their positions, staff members may have particular concerns, and the Q&A enables
customized explanations. This guarantees that the individual needs of all personnel,
including administrative and clinical professionals, are met.
Strengthening Learning
During the Q&A, staff members can reinforce their learning by talking about real-life
situations and issues. Additionally, it helps avoid misconceptions that can result in errors
after the EHR system is put into place.
Final Steps (15 Minutes) Summarizing the Classes:
Class of each session will conclude with key takeaways. A detailed summary will be
provided to ensure nothing is skipped.
Resources and Support:
The members will be provided with relevant resources including guidelines and manuals to
operate the EHR system. Furthermore, contact information will also be provided so that
every participant can reach out to the concerned person.
Follow Up:
Follow-up sessions will also be announced in case some participants need any session
again to cater unresolved issues.
Acknowledgement:
In the end, all participants will be thanked for their proactive involvement in the entire class.
They will be reminded of their importance in implementing this effective policy.
References
Aguirre, R., Suarez, O., Fuentes, M., & Sanchez-Gonzalez, M. A. (2020). Electronic health
record implementation: A review of resources and tools. Cureus, 11(9).
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.5649
Fennelly, O., Cunningham, C., Grogan, L., Cronin, H., O’Shea, C., Roche, M., Lawlor, F., &
O’Hare, N. (2020). Successfully implementing a national electronic health record: A rapid
umbrella review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104281
Musa, S., Dergaa, I., Shekh, A., & Singh, R. (2023). The impact of training on electronic
health records related knowledge, practical competencies, and staff satisfaction: A pre-post
intervention study among wellness center providers in a primary health-care facility. Journal
of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, Volume 16, 1551–1563.
https://doi.org/10.2147/jmdh.s414200
Valentina, C., Giovanna, A., Erika, N., Silvia, F., Maria, C. G., Gianfranco, M., & Leopoldo, S.
(2019). The use of blended learning to improve health professionals’ communication skills: a
literature review. Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis, 90(Suppl 4), 17–24.
https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i4-S.8330
1 Digital Health Records Implementation Presentation Speaker Notes Slide 1 Policy
Overview I’ll be introducing the policy for the implementation of digital health records today.
Tsai et al. (2020) suggest that in order to increase data accuracy, optimize workflows, and
strengthen adherence to HIPAA standards, this program replaces paper-based health
records with electronic health records. The basis for improved care quality and operational
efficiency is laid by electronic health records (EHR), which removes duplications, saves time,
and enhances care coordination with real-time data access. Slide 2 Why the Policy is
Necessary The current conventional system certainly shows: high error risks, delayed
access to patient data, and limited compliance with modern standards. EHR addresses
these issues by enabling quicker, more informed decision-making and fostering collaboration
across care teams (Oyeyemi Adeniyi et al., 2024). Most importantly, it ensures healthcare
regulations compliance, improving safety and accountability. Slide 3 Pilot Group Description
2 The ICU nursing staff is ideal for the pilot due to their high patient turnover and reliance on
accurate record management. Their feedback will help refine the system before a broader
rollout. The ICU’s fast-paced, high-stakes environment will allow us to assess EHR’s impact
on workflow efficiency and care quality comprehensively (Kleib, 2021). Slide 4 Metrics for
Evaluation Key metrics include documentation error rates, time to retrieve records, and
compliance with current processes. Post-implementation will measure error reduction, time
savings, and staff feedback on usability. These comparisons will quantify improvements and
identify areas for adjustment, ensuring a successful transition (Lee, 2024). Slide 5 Training
Implementation Training includes three sessions over two weeks, focusing on system
features, hands-on practice, and assessments. Resources like simulation labs, trainers, and
manuals will ensure readiness. Sessions combine classroom instruction and practical
application, giving staff the skills needed to implement the EHR system confidently (Dash et
al., 2019). Slide 6 Conclusion The Digital Health Records policy enhances data accuracy,
compliance, and care quality. The ICU pilot will provide insights to optimize the system
before organization-wide adoption. Comprehensive training ensures readiness, laying the
groundwork for a successful, sustainable transition. 3
References
Dash, S., Shakyawar, S. K., Sharma, M., & Kaushik, S. (2019). Big data in healthcare:
Management, analysis and future prospects. Journal of Big Data, 6(1), 1–25. springer.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-019-0217-0 Kleib, M. (2021). Academic Electronic Health
Records in Undergraduate Nursing Education: Mixed Methods Pilot Study. ProQuest, 4(2).
https://doi.org/10.2196/26944 Lee, J. (2024, April 11). Modern EHR Systems for Healthcare
Practices. HealthCare ITSM. https://healthcareitsm.com/blog/ehr-systems-healthcare/
Oyeyemi Adeniyi, A., Olawumi Arowoogun, J., Chidi, R., & Babawarun, O. (2024, February
28). The impact of electronic health records on patient care and outcomes: A comprehensive
review. ResearchGate; GSC Online Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378548846_The_impact_of_electronic_health_reco
rds _on_patient_care_and_outcomes_A_comprehensive_review Tsai, C. H., Eghdam, A.,
Davoody, N., Wright, G., Flowerday, S., & Koch, S. (2020). Effects of electronic health record
implementation and barriers to adoption and use: A scoping review and qualitative analysis
of the content. Life, 10(12), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/life10120327